<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawsciencetech.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawsciencetech.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 10:03:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rules Needed for Cyber-Warfare by Niels</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsciencetech.com/?p=218#comment-703</link>
		<dc:creator>Niels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 10:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawsciencetech.com/?p=218#comment-703</guid>
		<description>Amongst others NATO&#039;s Cooperative Cyber Defence Center of Excellence is working hard on these issues. The first thing to do is not create legislation, but create consensus about terminology in international frameworks. 

Creating laws on cyberattacks, without first defining what a cyberattack is, and where the thresholds are for considering these military attacks would not create much sense on inter-governmental levels.

Until this moment, no one can tell for example what the definition is of &#039;an act of cyberwarfare&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amongst others NATO&#8217;s Cooperative Cyber Defence Center of Excellence is working hard on these issues. The first thing to do is not create legislation, but create consensus about terminology in international frameworks. </p>
<p>Creating laws on cyberattacks, without first defining what a cyberattack is, and where the thresholds are for considering these military attacks would not create much sense on inter-governmental levels.</p>
<p>Until this moment, no one can tell for example what the definition is of &#8216;an act of cyberwarfare&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let the Reclassification Battle Begin! by Law &#187; Blog Archive &#187; FCC Votes To Start Reclassification Proceeding</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsciencetech.com/?p=199#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>Law &#187; Blog Archive &#187; FCC Votes To Start Reclassification Proceeding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawsciencetech.com/?p=199#comment-679</guid>
		<description>[...] Thursday, June 17 the FCC formally began the process to reclassify broadband from an “information service,” under Title I of the Communications Act, to a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thursday, June 17 the FCC formally began the process to reclassify broadband from an “information service,” under Title I of the Communications Act, to a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lieberman Unveils New Cybersecurity Bill by Law &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rules Needed for Cyber-Warfare</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsciencetech.com/?p=208#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>Law &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rules Needed for Cyber-Warfare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawsciencetech.com/?p=208#comment-678</guid>
		<description>[...] Congress debates Sen. Joseph Lieberman’s (I-CT) Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act of 2010, the U.S. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Congress debates Sen. Joseph Lieberman’s (I-CT) Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act of 2010, the U.S. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FIFA Prepared to Defend World Cup Trademarks by Law &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ambush Marketer Undeterred By FIFA Warnings</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsciencetech.com/?p=213#comment-640</link>
		<dc:creator>Law &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ambush Marketer Undeterred By FIFA Warnings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 21:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawsciencetech.com/?p=213#comment-640</guid>
		<description>[...] a tournament venue.  The allegation was not surprising for two reasons.  First, FIFA had vowed to aggressively defend its trademarks and its sponsors against unauthorized attempts to leverage the worldwide appeal of the event.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a tournament venue.  The allegation was not surprising for two reasons.  First, FIFA had vowed to aggressively defend its trademarks and its sponsors against unauthorized attempts to leverage the worldwide appeal of the event.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
